Iran’s Use of Polluting Fuel Oil Tripled in Six Years, Leaked Report Shows
Iran’s Use of Polluting Fuel Oil Tripled in Six Years, Leaked Report Shows

Iran’s Use of Polluting Fuel Oil Tripled in Six Years, Leaked Report Shows

Iran’s domestic consumption of mazut — one of the dirtiest fossil fuels — has more than tripled in the past six years, according to a classified Oil Ministry report obtained by Iran Open Data.

Why it matters:
Mazut, a high-sulfur fuel oil, is so polluting that it exceeds even coal in emissions. Its sulfur content — around 3.5% — is nearly seven times higher than international shipping fuel standards, making it nearly unsellable abroad. As a result, Iran burns most of its mazut domestically in power plants and urban industries.

By the numbers:

  • Iran’s daily mazut consumption rose from 14 million liters in 2017 to over 43 million liters in 2024.
  • In the same period, domestic use of cleaner fuels like LPG and kerosene fell sharply — even as exports of these fuels surged.
  • Around 30% of crude oil processed in Iranian refineries is converted into mazut and bitumen — nearly eight times the global average of 4%.
  • The Abadan refinery, Iran’s oldest, has the highest output of heavy fuels, with 44% of its crude converted into mazut and bitumen.
  • Shazand refinery performs better but still converts 18% of its intake — over four times the international benchmark.

The big picture:
A 2024 parliamentary research report warned that each liter of mazut emits four times more sulfur dioxide (SO₂) than diesel and over 1,200 times more than natural gas. SO₂ is a major air pollutant linked to respiratory diseases and acid rain.

Context:

  • Despite a previous plan under the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) to modernize refineries and reduce mazut production to below 10%, U.S. sanctions reimposed after the 2018 withdrawal halted all foreign collaboration.
  • Data from the commodity intelligence firm Kpler shows a decline in mazut exports, while LPG exports — a cleaner alternative — have sharply increased.

The government’s push for hard currency through fuel exports is clashing with domestic environmental needs, potentially creating long-term public health and infrastructure costs.